Skip to content

Cognee

★ New
assess
AI / ML open-source Apache-2.0 open-source

At a Glance

Open-source Apache-2.0 knowledge engine for AI agent memory that combines vector search and graph databases to ingest 30+ data source types into a queryable, self-improving knowledge graph.

Type
open-source
Pricing
open-source
License
Apache-2.0
Adoption fit
small, medium
Top alternatives

Cognee

What It Does

Cognee is an open-source Python library that ingests data from 30+ source types (PDFs, audio, images, SQL databases, Excel, Slack, DLT Hub) and builds a structured knowledge graph by combining vector and graph storage backends. Rather than treating memory as a flat vector store for semantic similarity search, Cognee extracts entities and relationships and stores them in a graph, enabling multi-hop reasoning queries that plain RAG pipelines cannot answer.

The core API exposes four operations: cognify (ingest and graph-enrich data), search (query by semantic, graph, or hybrid mode), forget (remove data and its graph edges), and improve (run Chain-of-Thought graph completion to strengthen relationship density). Session memory provides a fast in-process cache that asynchronously synchronises to the persistent graph. The project hit v1.0.0 on April 11, 2026, and has 15.5k GitHub stars as of that date.

Key Features

  • Graph + vector hybrid storage: Simultaneously indexes into vector stores (Qdrant, LanceDB, Milvus, Redis) and graph databases (Neo4j, NetworkX, Kuzu, FalkorDB), enabling both semantic similarity and relationship traversal at query time.
  • 30+ data source connectors: Native ingestion for PDFs, docs, Excel, audio, images, SQL databases, and DLT Hub with multimodal support (text, image, audio in a single pipeline).
  • Session memory with background sync: Fast in-memory cache for low-latency agent interactions with async graph synchronisation to durable storage.
  • improve pipeline: Chain-of-Thought graph completion that enriches existing graph edges and nodes — vendor benchmarks show +25% human-like correctness improvement post-optimisation.
  • User/tenant isolation: Separate memory namespaces per user or agent for multi-agent deployments, with permissions control.
  • Auto-routing: Query router selects between semantic vector search and graph traversal based on query structure.
  • OTEL observability: Built-in OpenTelemetry collector for pipeline tracing and monitoring.
  • Custom ontologies: Define domain-specific entity types and relationship schemas to ground the knowledge graph in your data model.
  • LLM-provider agnostic: Works with OpenAI (default), Llama, Anyscale, Gemini, and other providers.

Use Cases

  • Multi-hop agent reasoning: Agent needs to answer questions that require connecting facts across multiple documents (e.g., “Which policy applies to employees in jurisdiction X who joined before date Y?”).
  • Persistent knowledge base for copilots: Enterprise copilots needing to accumulate and query growing domain knowledge over weeks/months, not just session context.
  • Multimodal knowledge ingestion: Pipelines that ingest PDFs, audio transcripts, images, and structured data into a single queryable memory store.
  • Policy and compliance retrieval: Regulated industries (legal, healthcare, finance) where accurate multi-document reasoning outweighs latency requirements.
  • Research and analysis agents: Agents that need to synthesise information across many documents and surface connected insights rather than nearest-neighbour chunks.

Adoption Level Analysis

Small teams (<20 engineers): Fits well for teams that need graph-based memory and can tolerate Python-only SDKs. The open-source self-hosted path uses SQLite + LanceDB + Kuzu, avoiding cloud dependencies entirely. However, production domain-specific deployments require ontology customisation that demands engineering investment above the 6-line-demo baseline.

Medium orgs (20–200 engineers): Fits with caveats. The managed cloud offering (platform.cognee.ai) launched with v1.0.0 and is not yet battle-tested. Teams with polyglot stacks (TypeScript, Go) cannot use the SDK natively. Graph enrichment per ingestion scales LLM call costs; workloads with high-volume continuous ingestion will need careful cost modelling before adoption.

Enterprise (200+ engineers): Does not fit yet. The managed platform is pre-maturity (€7.5M seed, v1.0.0 as of April 2026), there is no documented SOC 2 certification, no enterprise SLA, and no TypeScript/Go SDK. The vendor logo wall on the homepage is unverified for production scale. Revisit when the platform has 12+ months of documented enterprise deployments.

Alternatives

AlternativeKey DifferencePrefer when…
Mem0Largest adoption (~52k stars), AWS-selected, TypeScript + Python SDKs, lower latency (148ms), graph features on paid tierLatency is critical, polyglot stack, or need proven production scale
Graphiti (Zep)Bitemporal knowledge graph with explicit validity windows, stronger at fact evolution over time, peer-reviewed arXiv paperFacts change over time and temporal accuracy matters (e.g., pricing, org structure)
Weaviate EngramBuilt on mature Weaviate vector DB infrastructure, preview stage, closer to enterprise database guaranteesAlready using Weaviate, or need enterprise DB operational model
LightRAGGraph-enhanced RAG without a full agent memory API, lighter-weight, academic originNeed graph context for RAG but not a full agent memory lifecycle
ChromaDBSimpler flat vector store, lower operational overheadMulti-hop reasoning not required, just semantic search

Evidence & Sources

Notes & Caveats

  • Python-only SDK: No TypeScript or Go client as of v1.0.0. Significant limitation for teams building TypeScript agent runtimes (Next.js, Vercel AI SDK, LangGraph.js).
  • Production gap vs. demo: The 6-line getting-started demo works for generic knowledge. Domain-specific deployments require ontology definition, relationship tuning, and pipeline customisation — an engineering effort that the marketing minimises. Independently confirmed by knowledgeplane.io review.
  • Benchmark caveat: All published benchmarks are vendor-produced on 24 HotPotQA questions. Vendor acknowledges HotPotQA does not test temporal reasoning, cross-document linking, or memory persistence. The benchmark code is open for replication but has not been independently replicated and published as of April 2026.
  • Ingestion latency: Graph enrichment runs LLM calls per ingested document, making the ingest pipeline significantly slower than plain vector stores. Not suitable as a real-time memory write path without queuing architecture.
  • Cloud platform maturity: platform.cognee.ai launched with v1.0.0 in April 2026. No documented uptime SLA, SOC 2 certification, or enterprise support tier.
  • Community size: 15.5k GitHub stars and 1.6k forks indicate healthy early traction, but is materially smaller than Mem0 (~52k stars) in the same category. Fewer community integrations and plugins.
  • Fresh install issues: Community-reported GitHub issues include failed tutorial notebooks on fresh installs (#1557) and embedding handler connection failures (#1409) — signs of integration surface area that still needs hardening.
  • Funding stage: €7.5M seed (investors: Angel Invest Berlin, Vermillion Cliffs Ventures, 42 Cap). Pre-Series-A company; evaluate vendor lock-in risk before building deep platform dependencies on the managed cloud offering.

Related